What Stores Cell Shoestring Licorice?

compliance guidelines, "Co-author" - the works!

. Since
informed the world's management in mid-November the staff by e-mail and posting on the new, from 1 January 2011 which become effective "compliance directive" - and did not mention a single word, that the present text with the council voted in great detail.

Annoying also because the works council and invested it on untertützender legal expert time and effort to guide the content and wording of the directive to "regular monitoring" in a direction in which the interests of employees not be neglected. Finally, the subject area, where to go etc. for gifts and invitations to the separation of home and business, and the proper handling of confidential information, a very sensitive area and a field with so many stumbling blocks (which you can not necessarily).

And demand, the draft of the management "defuse" it
was plenty. So the council prevented such that Employees who want to work extra jobs, apply for it in advance with an extensive form to the Geschäfsführung (!) Need (and then wait for the possible approval). only remained the duty of the management of an outside activity must be informed. inform

also the duty of the council in an infringement case, was enshrined in the Richmond line. Must, if the compliance officer Guido Schröer a possible violation of the regulations (by name or anonymous) is reported, the agent not only inform the management about it, but the council: provided, Mr. Schröer looks suspect to be reasonable, deals in detail with this matter.

Another scheme within the meaning of the workforce refers to the issue of checks and their results - and the use of employee data, such as e-mails or identification code (password etc.). Here, the works council must be informed - and he has the right, at the consultation of data obtained during the inspections to be present.

to what extent have the obligation of the compliance officer, also anonymous
indication of violation against the Richtinie investigate or verify these and consider its importance in practice, can only the future shows. Even if this will cause problems. The works in any case would have "the duty of anonymous editing" view prefers not at all taken into Regularium. So now - must address the compliance officer with no-name releases - in the first place.

It is hoped that the world staff the opportunity to "suspicious" to anonymously report abuse, are not - and that will befall Guido Schröer no flood of evidence and accusations - with the motto: "Mr. Schröer, I know there someone ... I'm as' what was observed ... ".
.